The replacement of the late Ted Kennedy by the hard-core Republican Scott Brown in the senate was a shock in the state that is considered as one of the most Democrat and liberal in the USA. Together with the rise of the Tea Party movement, it has been one of the big political topics of the year. I had been quite comfortable with the observations of my political environment (Obama ‘08 bumper stickers, Harvard intellectuals, legacy of the Kennedys) until I read about the contemporary Tea Party (see article in the New Yorker). Even when ignoring the goofiest climate change sceptics, creationists, and pro-life activists of the movement, it presents ideas difficult to understand from a Nordic welfare state perspective as they are against all kind of social spending.
Last Saturday, a day before yesterday’s exciting vote on the Obama health bill, some people had gathered in front of the Boston city hall to demonstrate against the health care plan that would guarantee health insurance for millions of uninsured Americans. At first, it was an entertaining sight, but eventually the horrifying reality behind it shocked me: the man carrying the sign “don’t spread my wealth, spread my work ethic” was actually being serious. What kind of people would spend the beautiful and sunny Saturday in order to manifest against everybody’s right to health care? Something I learnt already during my first year of social policy studies was that the health care system in the USA, excuse my French, sucks: it is the most expensive in the developed world and has huge gaps in coverage. Taking away universal access to health care in Europe would be unimaginable; here 50 million people are without health insurance. Hard to imagine how it is to call your parents: “Mum, you need to sell the car and the TV, I broke my arm…”
New York Times reported a Republican asking the Democrats yesterday: “Are you so arrogant that you know what’s best for the American people?” I’m out of words and I shouldn’t even bother because the whole health care discussion has been so unbelievably stupid and frustrating that no logical arguments seem to work (it’s like following the comments on newspapers' on-line discussions). Call it arrogance or elitism, but yes, those people not needing to sell their house in order to cure cancer in the future will be better off.
No comments:
Post a Comment